
Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence took place in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He’s a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this is certainly one worker whom keeps their very own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just walked in really calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been a few customers by them during the time and so they were terrified,’ he added.
Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and control of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of the two tales is really a bit more terrifying, once the axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a person in the employees at a wagering store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the royal vegas bonus bookie’s store at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant because of the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ plus the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up in the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
Voting Rights
The appropriate choice is associated with the theory that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of applicants whom have recommended that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that might be situated in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down towards the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it could have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in only one community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate payment, with arbitration required if the casinos and local governments can’t arrived at an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power on the vote that is entire. In other words, the casino could have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the complete city to be able to be approved.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six associated with the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in support of it, with just two coming down against it (with Conley and an added candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by the state as the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the recreations book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired premier activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is one regarding the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large number of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with betting shops and payday loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public areas and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in accordance using the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is no further a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be searching to destroy the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he truly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their workplace was accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.
Leave A Comment